Friday, August 30, 2013



TIME

Chemical Weapons in Syria: What You Should Know About Nerve Agents Like Sarin


WASHINGTON — Secretary of State John Kerry said Monday that a large-scale chemical weapons attack occurred in Syria. There are still many questions about chemical weapons, some of which can be answered easily and some of which can’t.
Q: What chemical weapon are we talking about?
A: It’s not clear yet. But experts point to a class of chemical weapons called nerve agents because of the symptoms seen in the victims in Syria. Nerve agents commonly include sarin, soman, VX and taubun. They are called nerve agents because they block transmission of nerve cell transmissions.
Q: What are the symptoms reported and how does that tell us nerve agents were used?
A: The humanitarian organization Doctors Without Borders reported seeing “large number of patients arriving with symptoms including convulsions, excessive saliva, pinpoint pupils, blurred vision and respiratory distress.” Dr. Amesh Adalja, a senior associate for the Center for Biosecurity at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, said what the group of doctors in Syria is reporting “is what a textbook would list to say nerve-agent poison.” Symptoms like incredibly small pupils help say it is not another chemical agent like mustard gas or chlorine gas.
Q: What’s the difference between the various nerve agents?
A: Essentially the four nerve agents do the same things to the body, kill in the same way, have the same antidote and treatment, and are all banned by the international convention signed by 189 countries so there is no practical difference for the U.S. in planning a response if it was sarin or VX, Adjala said. Sarin, sometimes called GB, is the most volatile of the nerve agents and VX the most lethal.
Q: Why do I hear the name sarin associated with this attack more than the others?
A: Mostly it is based on the Syrian leadership’s past likely use and storage of sarin, Adalja said.
Q: How do nerve agents kill?
A: They break down an enzyme that allows nerves to talk to each other, so victims become over-stimulated. In addition to other symptoms, there’s chest tightening, rapid breathing, vomiting, diarrhea, confusion, headache, changes in heart rate, loss of consciousness, convulsions and paralysis. Eventually, and depending on dose levels it could only be a matter of minutes, you do die of respiratory failure, Adalja said.
Q: Is it painful?
A: “The seizure, being paralyzed, if you are still awake, that can almost be torturous,” Adalja said.

Wednesday, August 28, 2013


NATURE

Stem cells mimic human brain

'Mini-brains' help researchers to study neurological diseases in living human tissue.
A cross-section of a brain-like clump of neural cells derived from human stem cells.
MADELINE A. LANCASTER
With the right mix of nutrients and a little bit of coaxing, human stem cells derived from skin can assemble spontaneously into brain-like chunks of tissue. Researchers provide the first description and application of these ‘mini-brains’ today in Nature1.
“It’s a seminal study to making a brain in a dish,” says Clive Svendsen, a neurobiologist at the University of California, Los Angeles, who was not involved in the study. “That’s phenomenal.” A fully formed artificial brain might still be years away, he notes, but the pea-sized neural clumps developed in this work could prove useful for researching human neurological diseases.

“The big surprise was that it worked,” says study co-author Juergen Knoblich, a developmental biologist at the Institute of Molecular Biotechnology in Vienna. The blobs grew to resemble the brains of fetuses in the ninth week of development.
Researchers have previously used human stem cells to grow structures resembling the eye2 and even tissue layers similar to the brain's cortex3. But in the latest advance, scientists developed bigger and more complex neural-tissue clumps by first growing the stem cells on a synthetic gel that resembled natural connective tissues found in the brain and elsewhere in the body. Then, they plopped the nascent clumps into a spinning bath to infuse the tissue with nutrients and oxygen.

An imperfect copy

Under a microscope, researchers saw discrete brain regions that seemed to interact with one another. But the overall arrangement of the different proto-brain areas varied randomly across tissue samples — amounting to no recognizable physiological structure.
“The entire structure is not like one brain,” says Knoblich, adding that normal brain maturation in an intact embryo is probably guided by growth signals from other parts of the body. The tissue balls also lacked blood vessels, which could be one reason that their size was limited to 3–4 millimetres in diameter, even after growing for 10 months or more.
Despite these limitations, the authors used the system to model key aspects of microcephaly, a condition that causes extremely stunted brain growth and cognitive impairment. Microcephaly and other neurodevelopmental disorders can be difficult to replicate in rodents because of species-specific differences in brain development.
The researchers found that tissue chunks cultured from stem cells derived from the skin of a single human with microcephaly did not grow as big as clumps grown from stem cells derived from a healthy person. They traced this effect to the premature differentiation of neural stem cells inside the microcephalic tissue chunks, depleting the population of progenitor cells that fuels normal brain growth.
The findings largely confirm prevailing theories about microcephaly, says Arnold Kriegstein, a developmental neurobiologist at the University of California, San Francisco. But, he adds, the study also demonstrates the potential for using human-stem-cell-derived tissues to model other disorders, if cell growth can be controlled more reliably.
“This whole approach is really in its early stages,” says Kriegstein. “The jury may still be out in terms of how robust this is.”

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Coroner: Mix of heroin and alcohol killed 'Glee' star

Watch this video(CNN) -- "Glee" star Cory Monteith died as a result of "a mixed drug toxicity, involving heroin and alcohol," the British Columbia Coroners Service said Tuesday.

"At this point there is no evidence to suggest Mr. Monteith's death was anything other than a most-tragic accident," the coroners service said in a statement, adding that no further details were available pending a full investigation.

Monteith, 31, was found dead Saturday in his room by staff members at Vancouver's Fairmont Pacific Rim Hotel after he missed his checkout time.
The actor spent time in rehab this year, checking into a drug addiction treatment facility in late March.

Monteith had been frank about his struggles with substance abuse, telling Parade magazine in 2011 that he began using drugs at 13 and by 19 went into rehab after his mother and friends intervened.

Mapping metabolism onto the prebiotic organic chemistry of hydrothermal vents



Deep-sea hydrothermal vents provide a chemical interface between Earth's reducing core and its oxidizing oceans. Today these environments support diverse chemosynthetic ecosystems (1), and after being discovered, they were soon proposed as the original site for the emergence of life (2). These hypotheses have considerable appeal but have not been universally accepted, partly because many aspects of the proposed scenarios remain experimentally unconstrained. In particular, much remains unknown about what forms of prebiotic organic chemistry could have been possible at vents, and whether they could have produced abundant biological precursors. Addressing these questions is thus a critical challenge for research on the origin of life. In PNAS, Novikov and Copley (3) take a major next step in addressing this challenge, developing a unique experimental instrument to systematically explore simulated hydrothermal vent chemistry. The authors focus on the chemistry of pyruvate, which has both a central role in modern metabolism and was plausibly formed prebiotically at hydrothermal vents (4).
A major distinction among origins of life hypotheses is the level of continuity they assume. “Genes/replication-first” hypotheses generally propose that life arose from self-replicating polymers and/or vesicles made up of organic substrates of interstellar or atmospheric origins and eventually created metabolism to replace those inputs as they became exhausted. By contrast, “metabolism-first” hypotheses propose that life emerged from energetically driven networks of geochemistry that were preserved and optimized, eventually becoming metabolism (Fig. 1). This debate of whether prebiotic chemistry was rewritten (genes-first) or kinetically encapsulated (metabolism-first) (5) also leaves room for a range of intermediate scenarios involving partial rewriting/encapsulation of prebiotic chemistry.
Fig. 1.
Summary of hypotheses for the emergence of metabolism at hydrothermal vents. Such hypotheses generally propose that metabolism emerged through the encapsulation of driven networks of geochemical reactions, in which pathways were largely preserved but catalysts were replaced.
Over the years, a range of arguments has been developed to support metabolism-first scenarios at hydrothermal vents. Hydrothermal vents/chimneys are porous structures with substantial surface areas of potentially catalytic minerals, through which vent effluents circulate under high pressure and across large temperature gradients. Several authors have argued (58) that on the early Earth, this would have created a global network of geochemical reactors that could have seeded life by generating and trapping organic substrates from simple inorganic inputs. It has further been argued that the accumulation within vents of inorganic electron donor–acceptor pairs, whose reactions are thermodynamically favored but kinetically slow, would have generated substantial redox stress, and that the emergence of metabolism would have created a chemical channel that allowed this stress to relax (9).
From the biological side, many phylogenomic studies conclude that clades exclusive to hydrothermal vents are the deepest branches in the tree of life (1). Further, most metabolic enzymes that catalyze anaerobic reactions with small gas molecules depend on transition-metal sulfide clusters that have been noted to resemble minerals common to vents (710). In addition, a recent complete reconstruction of the evolutionary history of carbon fixation (11) identified strategies generally used by hyperthermophiles as the deepest branching forms. That study led to the conclusion that the hierarchical architecture of metabolism can be explained as the outgrowth of kinetic feedback loops that stabilized an autocatalytic network topology first found at the small-molecule substrate level of the root of the tree of carbon fixation (12).
While providing an attractive conceptual framework, the strength of such arguments will ultimately depend on experiments that confirm that prebiotic chemistry at hydrothermal vents could have indeed produced analogs of pathways seen in modern metabolism. Some key results have been obtained in this area (4,1317), but in general, small molecule organic chemistry under realistic hydrothermal vent conditions is significantly underexplored. The work of Novikov and Copley thus occupies an important niche within origins of life research. Several key results of their work are highlighted next.
First, the authors develop an elegant design, including a unique gas-inlet compressor valve system, that allows experimental conditions to be easily adapted and controlled at the high temperatures (T) and pressures (p) reflective of hydrothermal vents. Previous studies have tended to either operate at more moderate (T, p) conditions (1314), or for higher (T, p) regimes, relied on in situ generation of reactant gasses within welded gold tubes (4). This increased control over larger regions of relevant experimental parameter space within the same system is important, because local physical-chemical conditions can vary significantly between different locations within the same vent, as well as between vents. The authors use this capacity to systematically explore how the branching ratios of mass flux within a given reaction network change in different parts of parameter space, focusing in particular on the role of mineral catalysts. Similar to findings for other organic species (16), Novikov and Copley show how different classes of iron-sulfur minerals substantially alter the mass flux topology of the pyruvate reaction network. Studies of this sort can thus help improve our understanding of the variability of prebiotic chemistry within and across hydrothermal vents while also making it possible to consider how the parallel activation of different (sub)networks at different vent locations could have allowed access to pathways not possible under single environmental conditions.
Second, although branching ratios within the network of pyruvate chemistry vary widely, the authors surprisingly find that the total number of contributing pathways across all trials is very limited. If these results prove general for other starting mixtures of plausibly prebiotic small organic molecules, it may help explain why metabolism is sparse, using only a small subset of all possible organic molecules of a given size and stoichiometry (18). Mass concentration within abiotic networks was likely important, because if matter was distributed over too many different pathways it could have significantly decreased the likelihood of more complex structures and functions emerging. For example, carbonaceous meteorites and asteroids generally contain a much larger suite of organics than is used by living systems, with relatively low concentrations of any one compound. Thus, even if total abundances of such organic inputs were high, scenarios depending on them require plausible mechanisms to explain how only small subsets of compounds could have been selected out of highly distributed sets to become part of living systems. If instead metabolism emerged directly from geochemical networks with inorganic inputs, and studies indicate that the number of significantly contributing pathways at hydrothermal vents was likely somewhat limited, then the sparseness of metabolism could in part be a reflection of the sparseness of hydrothermal geochemistry.
Third, and perhaps most strikingly, most of the reactions and bond formations observed by Novikov and Copley feature prominently
within metabolism, albeit with different catalysts. In particular, the reconstructed reaction network included the formation of thiols and disulfides, and hydrogenation, aldol, and reductive amination reactions. Previous experimental simulations of hydrothermal vent chemistry (4, 1317) had observed those same classes of organic chemistry, as well as others that have central metabolic roles: (de-)hydration reactions, CO insertions and reductions (to activated methyl groups), and the subsequent formation of activated acetic acid and pyruvate. A limited but growing body of evidence thus suggests that metabolism may indeed exploit organic chemistry readily accessible at hydrothermal vents. Highlighting the possibility of scenarios involving partial rewriting of prebiotic chemistry, the authors also observe the formation of fatty acids through a reaction type not used in metabolism. Debates on the merits of metabolism-first hypotheses would benefit greatly from additional studies systematically exploring these questions.
More generally, prebiotic organic chemistry at hydrothermal vents represents one subspace in a larger “possibility space” of naturally occurring organic chemistry. Examples of other subspaces are those occupied by metabolism, photogeochemistry (19), interstellar, or atmospheric chemistry. A general goal of the study of living systems and their emergence is to distinguish those features arising from historical contingencies of evolution from those arising from natural laws of biology (20). Systematic studies of classes of natural organic chemistry, such as pursued by Novikov and Copley for hydrothermal vents, may thus help us not just in asking why life selected the forms of organic chemistry that it uses, but also to identify fundamental constraints in biology that result from that choice of chemistry.

Wednesday, August 14, 2013


NATURE | NEWS

Smart glass blocks heat or light at flick of a switch

Spray-on coating is a step towards energy-efficient windows.

A film sprayed onto glass (left) can block heat and visible light.
ANNA LLORDÉS, LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LAB

An engineered window coating can be tweaked to respond to changing weather conditions. Small voltages applied to the material trigger it to block heat and, independently, light.
Selective control over the amount of heat and light passing through windows could help to keep buildings cool during the summer and warm during the winter. Around 4% of all energy consumed in the United States is used to cool or warm buildings to compensate for heat transfer through windows, according to the US Department of Energy.
“The ability to perform well in hot and cold climates could mean big energy savings,” says Delia Milliron, a materials chemist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in Berkeley, California, who led the team that developed the material.

The researchers embedded some of those nanoscale heat sponges into glass made from niobium oxide, which darkens when exposed to current. Together, the two materials allow control of both heat and visible light passing through the window. The composite remains essentially transparent to both forms of radiation until a voltage is applied, at which point the crystals switch on to soak up heat. Boost that voltage, and the crystals continue to block heat as the niobium oxide darkens, screening out light.
The recipe, reported in Nature1, calls for nanoscale crystals of indium tin oxide, a conductive material used to coat flat-panel displays. When indium tin oxide is jolted with electricity, the extra electrons help it to absorb as much as 35% of heat-producing near-infrared radiation passed through the crystals.

Strength in numbers

Each of the two ingredients is better at screening radiation as part of the team than on its own. When they are bonded, the composite material can stop a little more than 50% of heat and 70% of visible light. And it remains stable even after being switched on and off 2,000 times.
Milliron is developing the technology with a start-up company called Heliotrope in Oakland, California, which specializes in smart windows. Her coating can be sprayed onto the inside of a glass pane. But turning the coating off and on requires applying a voltage directly to its surface. In the lab, Milliron generated the needed voltage by incorporating the material into a battery. Out in the real world, thin, transparent films layered on top of the coating will be needed to supply that voltage.
Such modifications will make smart windows expensive, says Brian Korgel, a materials chemist at the University of Texas at Austin and the author of a News & Views article on the research. If the technology is to be adopted, “the overall cost of the system cannot be prohibitively high”, he warns.
Energy savings could help to offset the large price tag, but Milliron is also looking for ways to cut costs. One option may be to replace the expensive indium tin oxide with cheaper zinc-based crystals, which have already shown promise in the lab.

NATURE NEWS

‘Safe’ levels of sugar harmful to mice

Diet comparable to that of many Americans left animals struggling to reproduce and to compete for territory.

It may not take that much sugar for it to have ill effects on health, a study on mice suggests.
JGI/JAMIE GRILL/BLEND IMAGES/CORBIS
Too much sugar is bad for you, but how much, exactly, is too much? A study in mice has found that the animals' health and ability to compete can be harmed by a diet that has sugar levels equivalent to what many people in the United States currently consume.
High-sugar diets are associated not only with obesity and diabetes, but also with other human conditions such as coronary heart disease. However, the exact causal links for many of these has not been established. When studies are done in mice to evaluate health effects of sugar, the doses given are often so high, and outside the range of equivalent human consumption, that it is hard to tell conclusively whether the results are relevant to people.
“Nobody has been able to show adverse effects at human-relevant levels,” says Wayne Potts, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City.

Healthy competition
But in a study published today in Nature Communications1, Potts and his colleagues looked at what happens under conditions comparable to the lifestyles of a substantial number of people in the United States. The researchers bred a pair of wild mice captured by Potts in a bakery, and fed offspring a diet in which 25% of the calories came from sugar. This is the maximum 'safe' level recommended by the US National Academies and by the US Department of Agriculture, and such a diet is consumed by around 13–25% of the US population. The safe level is roughly equivalent to drinking three cans of sugary drinks a day but having an otherwise sugar-free diet.
After 26 weeks on this sugar binge, the mice were released into a large habitat that mimicked their natural environment and were left to compete for food and territory with an equal number of control mice that had been fed a healthy diet. The sugar-eaters did not fare well. Over the 32-week duration of the experiment, sugar-fed females died at nearly twice the rate of control females and the males controlled about one-quarter less territory and had one-quarter fewer offspring than their control counterparts.
The team tracked seven markers of metabolic health, including body weight and insulin levels, and five of those markers showed no difference between experimental mice and controls. But Potts says that mimicking the intense competition in natural mouse colonies enabled the researchers to see the effects of a high-sugar diet, even without metabolic evidence of harm. “The mice can really tell us ‘no, I’m not 100%’,” says Potts, even if current technology cannot detect anything amiss in specific metabolic pathways.
Walter Willett, an epidemiologist and chair of the department of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts, says that the study adds to the weight of evidence that the levels of sugar consumed by millions of people in the United States are harmful. But he says it would be helpful if the team had been able to determine what was killing the female mice, and tie that to a human condition. “I doubt these mice were dying of heart disease,” he says.
James Ruff, a biologist in Potts' lab and a co-author of the study, says that it was not possible to collect the dead females often enough to study their cause of death without disturbing the experiment and throwing off the other results. “It’s a trade-off,” he says.
But Potts and Ruff think that their results are enough to indicate that there is a problem, and that the recommended safe level of dietary sugar should be lowered. “If I show that something hurts mice, do you really want it in your body before we’ve determined whether it’s a mouse-only problem?” asks Potts.